Stop Pretending Your Team Knows How to Communicate: Why Most Workplace Communication Training Misses the Mark

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Deviant Art | Pexels | Walkscore

Three months ago, I watched a $2.3 million contract walk out the door because Sarah from accounts couldn't explain a simple invoice discrepancy to our biggest client. Not because she didn't understand the numbers – she's brilliant with spreadsheets – but because when put on the spot during a video call, she mumbled something about "system updates" and "processing delays" that made us sound like amateurs.

That's when it hit me. After 18 years in business consulting across Melbourne, Perth, and Sydney, I've seen this same scenario play out hundreds of times. We're absolutely useless at teaching people how to actually communicate in the workplace.

The £50,000 Miscommunication That Changed Everything

Back in 2019, I was working with a mining company in Western Australia. Their project manager – let's call him Dave – had been with the company for twelve years. Solid performer, knew the technical side backwards, great with the crew. But Dave had this habit of nodding along in meetings, saying "yeah, no worries" to everything, then going off and doing something completely different.

Turns out Dave wasn't being difficult. He genuinely thought he understood what was being asked of him. The problem? His manager spoke in corporate buzzwords ("we need to optimise our operational efficiency") whilst Dave spoke in practical terms ("just tell me what needs fixing"). They were having two different conversations for months.

The result? A £50,000 equipment order that nobody actually wanted, sitting in a warehouse in Karratha collecting dust.

Why Most Communication Training Is Absolute Rubbish

Here's what drives me mental about most workplace communication training programs: they're designed by people who've never worked a real job in their lives. These consultants rock up with their PowerPoint presentations about "active listening techniques" and "non-verbal communication strategies" like they're revealing the secrets of the universe.

Meanwhile, your actual employees are sitting there thinking about how to tell their boss that the client's demands are completely unrealistic without getting fired.

The biggest myth in corporate Australia? That communication problems are about technique. Wrong. They're about culture, hierarchy, and the fact that most workplaces actively punish honest communication.

I've seen managers who demand "transparency" but lose their minds when someone points out a genuine problem. I've watched teams where junior staff have brilliant ideas but never speak up because last time someone did, they got a lecture about "staying in their lane."

The Real Communication Breakdown: It's Not What You Think

After analysing communication failures across 200+ Australian businesses, I've noticed something interesting. The breakdowns rarely happen where you'd expect them.

It's not the heated arguments in boardrooms – those actually tend to resolve pretty quickly because the conflict is obvious. It's the quiet misunderstandings that fester for weeks. The assumptions that nobody bothers to verify. The emails that get misinterpreted because someone was rushing between meetings.

Take email communication, for instance. I reckon 67% of workplace conflicts start with poorly written emails. Not angry emails – just unclear ones. Someone sends a message thinking they're being efficient, the recipient reads it as dismissive or rude, and suddenly you've got a situation.

But here's the thing most communication skills training programs won't tell you: the solution isn't always better writing. Sometimes it's picking up the phone. Sometimes it's walking over to someone's desk. Sometimes it's admitting that an email chain has gone completely off the rails and starting over.

The Australian Problem: We're Too Polite to Communicate Properly

This might be controversial, but I reckon our Australian tendency to be "nice" is actually hurting workplace communication. We're so worried about offending someone that we dance around issues instead of addressing them directly.

I was working with a team in Adelaide last year where this played out perfectly. The graphic designer kept delivering work that wasn't quite right, but instead of giving clear feedback, the marketing manager kept saying things like "it's pretty good, maybe we could just..." and then suggesting fifteen different changes.

The designer was getting frustrated because she thought her work was "pretty good" but clearly wasn't good enough. The marketing manager was getting frustrated because he felt like he was being ignored. Neither of them was actually communicating what they needed.

The solution wasn't a communication workshop about giving feedback. It was a conversation about expectations and a simple agreement: "If something needs changing, tell me exactly what's wrong and what you want instead. I promise not to take it personally."

What Actually Works: The Uncomfortable Truth

Real communication training needs to focus on three things that most programs avoid like the plague:

First: Teaching people how to disagree professionally. This isn't about conflict resolution techniques – it's about normalising the fact that smart people can look at the same information and reach different conclusions. Most Australian workplaces treat disagreement as a personal attack instead of a natural part of problem-solving.

Second: Creating systems that force clarity. You can teach active listening until you're blue in the face, but if your meeting culture is broken, nothing will change. I've seen companies transform their communication simply by requiring that every meeting end with someone summarising what was decided and who's doing what by when.

Third: Acknowledging that some people are just better communicators than others. This is where I'll probably get some pushback, but not everyone needs to be a presentation superstar. Some brilliant technical people communicate better through written reports than verbal updates. Some creative types need visual aids to explain their ideas properly. Stop trying to force everyone into the same communication mould.

The Technology Trap That's Making Everything Worse

Don't get me started on how Slack and Microsoft Teams have somehow made workplace communication both easier and more complicated at the same time. I watched one team have a three-hour Slack argument about something that could have been resolved with a five-minute conversation.

But here's the twist – some of the best communicators I know have figured out how to use these tools brilliantly. They know when to use a quick Slack message, when to schedule a proper call, and when to just walk over and have a chat.

The problem isn't the technology; it's that we're using it without thinking about what type of communication actually fits the situation.

What Your Communication Training Should Actually Cover

Instead of generic workshops about body language and tone of voice, try focusing on practical scenarios your team actually faces:

How do you tell a client their timeline is unrealistic without losing the contract? How do you explain a technical problem to someone who doesn't understand the technical side? How do you give feedback to someone who's senior to you but making mistakes?

These are the conversations that matter, and they're the ones most training programs ignore because they're messy and context-specific.

I've started running professional development training sessions where we use actual examples from the workplace instead of role-playing scenarios from a textbook. The difference in engagement is remarkable.

The Follow-Up Problem Nobody Talks About

Here's something that will make you rethink your entire approach to workplace communication: most problems aren't about the initial conversation. They're about what happens afterwards.

You have a great meeting, everyone seems to understand what needs to happen, and then... nothing. Or the wrong thing. Or half the right thing done in completely the wrong way.

This isn't a communication problem in the traditional sense. It's a follow-up and accountability problem disguised as a communication issue.

The best communicators I know aren't necessarily the most charismatic speakers. They're the ones who send clear summary emails after meetings, check in on progress without being annoying, and aren't afraid to ask clarifying questions when something doesn't make sense.

Why Most Managers Are Terrible at This

Let me be blunt: if you're a manager and your team has communication problems, there's a decent chance you're part of the problem.

I've worked with managers who complain that their staff don't communicate properly, then interrupt them every time they try to explain something. Managers who say they want honest feedback but get defensive when they receive it. Managers who demand detailed updates but don't have time to read them properly.

The worst part? Most of these managers went through communication training themselves. They can quote all the theory about effective communication, but they can't model it consistently.

The Real Solution: Stop Overthinking It

After nearly two decades of watching workplace communication succeed and fail, I've reached a controversial conclusion: most communication problems would disappear if people just said what they meant and asked for clarification when they didn't understand something.

That's it. No complicated frameworks, no personality assessments, no elaborate feedback systems. Just honest, direct communication with enough humility to admit when you're confused.

But here's why this is harder than it sounds: it requires psychological safety. People need to know they won't be punished for speaking up, asking questions, or admitting they don't understand something.

Creating that environment? That's the real work. Everything else is just window dressing.

---

The next time someone tries to sell you a communication training program that promises to transform your workplace culture in a day, ask them this: what happens when people go back to their desks and face the same systemic issues that created the communication problems in the first place? If they don't have a good answer, save your money.