How to Become More Inclusive at Work: Stop Making It Harder Than It Needs to Be

Connect with us: SB Nation | Doodle or Die | Medium | Pexels | Komoot

Here's something that'll probably annoy half the HR departments reading this: most workplace inclusion initiatives fail because they're designed by committees who've never actually worked on a factory floor, sold insurance door-to-door, or dealt with an angry customer at 5:59 PM on a Friday.

I've been running workplace training programs across Australia for nearly two decades now, and I've watched companies spend thousands on diversity consultants while their best multicultural employees quietly quit because nobody bothered asking them what they actually needed. It's maddening.

The Real Problem Nobody Talks About

Let me tell you about Sarah. She was a brilliant software developer who joined a tech company in Melbourne three years ago. The company had all the right policies - gender equality statements, cultural awareness workshops, the works. But Sarah left after eighteen months because every time she suggested a different approach in meetings, her male colleagues would nod politely and then continue with their original plan.

That's not a policy problem. That's a listening problem.

The mistake most organisations make is treating inclusion like a compliance box to tick rather than a competitive advantage to unlock. They focus on avoiding lawsuits instead of building teams that actually work better together.

What Inclusiveness Actually Means (And What It Doesn't)

Here's where I'll lose some people: true workplace inclusion isn't about making everyone comfortable all the time. It's about creating an environment where different perspectives can clash productively without anyone feeling personally attacked.

I've seen too many workplaces where "inclusive" means avoiding any conversation that might make someone uncomfortable. That's not inclusion - that's paralysis.

Real inclusiveness means:

• Actually listening when people speak, not just waiting for your turn to talk
• Recognising that different backgrounds bring different problem-solving approaches
• Understanding that what motivates your top performer might completely demotivate someone else

It doesn't mean walking on eggshells or pretending everyone's ideas are equally brilliant.

The Three Things That Actually Work

After watching hundreds of companies try to improve their inclusion efforts, I've noticed three approaches that consistently produce results:

1. Start with the small stuff that drives people crazy

Before you launch another unconscious bias workshop, fix the basics. Is your office kitchen always running out of coffee by 2 PM? Are the meeting rooms constantly double-booked? Do people have to fight for parking spaces every morning?

Sounds trivial? It's not. When people feel like their basic needs aren't considered, they're less likely to speak up about bigger issues.

2. Give people real influence, not just input

The fastest way to make someone feel excluded is to ask for their opinion and then ignore it completely. Either give people genuine decision-making power or don't waste their time with token consultation.

I worked with a Brisbane manufacturing company where management kept asking floor workers for suggestions about efficiency improvements. After six months of "we'll consider that" responses, the suggestions stopped coming. The workers didn't feel stupid - they felt dismissed.

3. Measure what actually matters

Most companies track diversity numbers but ignore inclusion outcomes. They'll tell you proudly that 40% of their new hires are women but can't explain why female employees are twice as likely to leave within their first year.

Start measuring things like:

• How often do team members disagree openly in meetings?
• Do promotion rates vary significantly between different demographic groups?
• Are people from different backgrounds equally likely to volunteer for challenging projects?

The Leadership Challenge

Here's something that might surprise you: the biggest barrier to workplace inclusion isn't usually malicious discrimination. It's lazy leadership.

Most managers simply hire people who remind them of themselves because it's easier. They don't actively exclude anyone - they just never actively include anyone different either.

I've worked with communication training programs where the biggest breakthrough came when a senior manager admitted he'd been unconsciously giving the best assignments to the two team members who supported the same football team he did. Not because he was trying to be unfair, but because those were the conversations that flowed naturally.

Breaking that pattern requires conscious effort. Every single day.

Why Australian Workplaces Are Actually Pretty Good at This

Despite what you might read in the headlines, Australian workplaces have some natural advantages when it comes to inclusion. Our multicultural heritage means most of us grew up around people from different backgrounds. We're generally pretty good at taking the piss out of everyone equally.

But we also have some blind spots. We can be too casual about things that matter deeply to other people. I've seen perfectly well-meaning Aussie managers inadvertently exclude international colleagues by conducting important conversations over after-work drinks at the pub.

The solution isn't to stop having drinks at the pub. It's to have multiple ways for people to connect and contribute.

The Small Changes That Make Big Differences

Some of the most effective inclusion improvements I've seen have been surprisingly simple:

Meeting management that actually works

Start every meeting by explicitly asking if anyone has questions or different perspectives. Not just at the end when everyone's mentally checked out - right at the beginning when it might actually influence the discussion.

Project assignment transparency

Instead of giving the interesting projects to whoever asks loudest, create a transparent process where people can express interest and you rotate opportunities fairly.

Communication style flexibility

Some people think best out loud in meetings. Others need time to process before contributing. Professional development training programs that help managers recognise and accommodate different communication styles consistently produce better team outcomes.

When Inclusion Efforts Backfire

I've also seen plenty of inclusion initiatives that made things worse instead of better. Usually because they focused on what not to do rather than what to do instead.

The worst example was a Sydney accounting firm that spent three months training everyone on microaggressions. By the end, people were so worried about saying the wrong thing that they stopped having informal conversations altogether. The office became more segregated, not less.

The lesson? Don't lead with prohibition. Lead with possibility.

The Generational Factor Nobody Mentions

Here's something most inclusion experts won't tell you: different generations have completely different ideas about what workplace inclusion looks like.

Younger employees often want explicit recognition of differences and structured support systems. Older employees sometimes prefer to be treated "just like everyone else" and find too much attention to their background patronising.

Both approaches have merit. Both can coexist. But only if you're paying attention to what individuals actually want rather than what you think they should want.

I worked with a Perth mining company where they created employee resource groups for different demographics. The participation rates varied wildly - not because some groups didn't care about inclusion, but because some preferred informal networks while others wanted official recognition and budget allocation.

Smart managers adapt their approach to what works for each person.

The Technology Trap

One thing that drives me crazy about modern inclusion efforts is the over-reliance on technology solutions. Yes, AI can help remove bias from resume screening. Yes, anonymous feedback platforms can surface issues that people won't raise face-to-face.

But inclusion fundamentally happens in human interactions. You can't automate your way to a more inclusive workplace any more than you can automate your way to better customer service.

The companies that get this right focus their technology on removing barriers and measuring outcomes, not on replacing human judgment and connection.

Making It Sustainable

The biggest challenge with workplace inclusion isn't starting - it's sustaining the effort when the initial enthusiasm wears off.

Most inclusion initiatives follow the same pattern: big launch, lots of energy, gradual decline, eventual abandonment. Usually because they were treated as projects rather than ongoing practices.

The companies that maintain momentum do three things differently:

They integrate inclusion into existing business processes rather than treating it as a separate initiative. They celebrate small wins consistently rather than waiting for major breakthroughs. And they make inclusion part of how managers are evaluated and promoted.

The Bottom Line

Creating a more inclusive workplace isn't about being politically correct or avoiding lawsuits. It's about unlocking the potential of everyone on your team.

But it requires more than good intentions. It requires conscious effort, honest feedback, and the willingness to change systems that might be working fine for some people but creating barriers for others.

Most importantly, it requires accepting that inclusion is an ongoing practice, not a destination you arrive at.

The companies that figure this out don't just become better places to work. They become more innovative, more resilient, and more profitable.

Which should be motivation enough for any business leader worth their salt.

---

Looking to improve workplace communication and inclusion in your organisation? Check out our effective communication training programs designed specifically for Australian businesses.